The face-off between liberals and leftists outside the headquarters of the company that publishes the weekly newspaper, Southern Weekend, came after disgruntled editors and reporters at the paper last week deplored what they said was crude meddling by the top propaganda official in Guangdong Province, which has long had a reputation as a bastion of a relatively free press.
With a number of celebrities and business leaders rallying online to the liberal cause, senior propaganda officials in Beijing began this week to roll out a national strategy of demonizing the rebel journalists and their supporters. The Central Propaganda Department issued a directive to news organizations saying that the defiant outburst at Southern Weekend, also known as Southern Weekly, had involved “hostile foreign forces.”
The order, translated by China Digital Times, a research group at the University of California, Berkeley, that studies Chinese news media, said that Chinese journalists must drop their support for Southern Weekend and insisted that “party control of the media is an unwavering basic principle.”
An editor at a party news organization said the term “hostile forces” had been used in an internal discussion with a senior editor about the Southern Weekend conflict. Several Chinese journalists outside Guangdong said Tuesday that a positive outcome for the frustrated Southern Weekend reporters and editors appeared uncertain, and that their call for the dismissal of Tuo Zhen, the top provincial propaganda official, who took up his post in May, was probably too radical for higher authorities to accept.
The protesting journalists at Southern Weekend blame Mr. Tuo, a former journalist himself, for ordering a drastic change in a New Year’s editorial that had originally called for greater respect for constitutional rights. The revised editorial instead praised party policies. Mr. Tuo has not commented.
A former editor at the Nanfang Media Group, which includes Southern Weekend, said negotiations continued on Tuesday between provincial propaganda officials and representatives of the disgruntled journalists and editors.
The former editor, who asked that his name not be used for fear it could jeopardize his current job, said the talks focused on the protesting journalists’ demands for an inquiry into the New Year’s episode and for the newspaper’s managers to rescind a statement that absolved Mr. Tuo of responsibility for the editorial.
“They want that statement to be removed, and they also want assurances about relaxing controls on journalists — not removing party oversight, but making it more reasonable, allowing reporters to challenge officials,” he said. “The other main demand is for an impartial explanation of what happened, an accounting so it won’t happen again.”
The former editor said a continued standoff into Wednesday could jeopardize the newspaper’s usual publication on Thursday. “In effect, it’s a strike,” he said. “It looks unclear whether it can come out on Thursday.”
So far, senior Chinese officials have not commented publicly on the censorship dispute at the paper, which could test how far the recently appointed Communist Party leader, Xi Jinping, will go in support of more open economic and political policies. “I don’t believe that Xi is totally hypocritical when he talks about reform,” said Chen Min, a prominent former opinion writer for Southern Weekend who was forced out of the newspaper in 2011 during a party-led crackdown on potential dissent.
Defenders of Communist orthodoxy turned up at the newspaper headquarters on Tuesday to make the case for firm party control of the media.
“We support the Communist Party, shut down the traitor newspaper,” said a cardboard sign held up by one of 10 or so conservative demonstrators.
“Southern Weekend has an American dream,” another sign said. “We don’t want the American dream, we want the Chinese dream.”
Most of the party supporters refused to give their names. One who did, Yang Xingfa, 50, from Hunan Province, said: “Southern Weekend belongs to the people. However, the paper always ignores the achievements of the Chinese Communist Party and asks why China isn’t more like the United States. Outrageous!”
Some of the participants held portraits of Mao; others waved the red flags of China and of the Communist Party. They said they had come on their own initiative and not at the behest of officials.
The dueling protests outside the newspaper headquarters reflected the political passions and tensions raised by the quarrel over censorship. Internet chatter about the conflict has become widespread, and finding a resolution to the standoff poses a challenge both to the central authorities and to Hu Chunhua, the new party chief of Guangdong and a potential candidate to succeed Mr. Xi in a decade.
Hundreds of bystanders watched and took photos on cellphones as the leftists shouted at the 20 or more protesters who had gathered to denounce censorship, and shoving matches broke out between the demonstrators. The 70 or so police officers and security guards mostly watched, stepping in on occasion to separate the two sides.
At one point, leftists were showered with 50-cent renminbi currency notes, which are worth about 8 United States cents. The Fifty-Cent Party has become a popular term used to disparage pro-party leftists, who are accused by critics of taking 50 cents as payment for each pro-party message they post on the Internet.
One defender of the Southern Weekend journalists was Liang Taiping, 28, a poet who wore a mask popularized by the Hollywood movie and British comic book “V for Vendetta.” Mr. Liang said he had bought the mask after watching the movie recently on state-run China Central Television, which had surprised many Chinese with its willingness to show the film uncut, since the film advocates the overthrow of a one-party dictatorship.
“It’s the only newspaper in China that’s willing to tell the truth,” said Mr. Liang, who added that he had traveled by train about 350 miles from the southern city of Changsha to show his support. “What’s the point of living if you can’t even speak freely?”
Edward Wong reported from Guangzhou, and Chris Buckley from Hong Kong. Jonah M. Kessel contributed reporting from Guangzhou, and Jonathan Ansfield from Beijing. Mia Li contributed research from Guangzhou.
